Hakan DÖNMEZ
CONTENTS
1. Introduction ..................................................................................1
2. What Happened in Jogee? ............................................................7
3. Mens rea in murder crimes by a sole perpetrator.......................10
3.1. R v Hyam ............................................................................12
3.2. R v Moloney........................................................................14
3.3. R v Hancock and Shankland ...............................................15
3.4. R v Nedrick .........................................................................16
3.5. R v Woollin..........................................................................17
4. Current Problem .........................................................................22
4.1. Should there be parity in judging accessories and
principals? ...........................................................................23
5. Different Competing Suggestions, One Reasonable Way .........28
5.1. Cognitive-based Suggestions .............................................29
5.2. Volition-based Route ...........................................................41
6. Conclusions................................................................................49
Table of Cases....................................................................................55
Hakan DÖNMEZ
CONTENTS
1. Introduction ..................................................................................1
2. What Happened in Jogee? ............................................................7
3. Mens rea in murder crimes by a sole perpetrator.......................10
3.1. R v Hyam ............................................................................12
3.2. R v Moloney........................................................................14
3.3. R v Hancock and Shankland ...............................................15
3.4. R v Nedrick .........................................................................16
3.5. R v Woollin..........................................................................17
4. Current Problem .........................................................................22
4.1. Should there be parity in judging accessories and
principals? ...........................................................................23
5. Different Competing Suggestions, One Reasonable Way .........28
5.1. Cognitive-based Suggestions .............................................29
5.2. Volition-based Route ...........................................................41
6. Conclusions................................................................................49
Table of Cases....................................................................................55
| Taksit Sayısı | Taksit tutarı | Genel Toplam |
|---|---|---|
| Tek Çekim | 121,25 | 121,25 |
| Taksit Sayısı | Taksit tutarı | Genel Toplam |
|---|---|---|
| Tek Çekim | 121,25 | 121,25 |
| Taksit Sayısı | Taksit tutarı | Genel Toplam |
|---|---|---|
| Tek Çekim | 121,25 | 121,25 |
| Taksit Sayısı | Taksit tutarı | Genel Toplam |
|---|---|---|
| Tek Çekim | 121,25 | 121,25 |
| Taksit Sayısı | Taksit tutarı | Genel Toplam |
|---|---|---|
| Tek Çekim | 121,25 | 121,25 |


